
Administering the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) can feel like navigating a minefield for many HR professionals. The law is complex, its regulations are dense, and a single misstep can lead to significant legal and financial consequences for an organization. While most employers strive for FMLA compliance, simple administrative errors and misunderstandings of the rules are incredibly common. These mistakes, though often unintentional, can result in government investigations, costly lawsuits, and damage to employee trust.
This post will explore the most frequent FMLA mistakes employers make and, more importantly, explain how formal FMLA certification provides HR professionals with the expertise to avoid them. We will break down specific errors, from failing to recognize a leave request to mishandling an employee's return to work. Understanding these common pitfalls is the first step toward building a more robust and compliant employee leave management process. By investing in proper training, you can transform a key area of risk into a demonstration of your organization's commitment to its employees and the law.
One of the most fundamental and costly mistakes an employer can make is failing to identify a potential FMLA situation. Many managers and even some HR staff believe they only need to act when an employee explicitly uses the words "FMLA" or "Family and Medical Leave." This is incorrect. The law places the responsibility on the employer to recognize when an employee provides enough information to suggest their need for leave could be for an FMLA-qualifying reason.
An employee might say they need time off because their "son is having surgery," their "mother is very ill," or they are "dealing with a serious health issue." All of these statements should trigger the employer's FMLA process. Ignoring these cues or waiting for the employee to use specific magic words can lead to a claim of FMLA interference.
An employee informs his supervisor that he will need to miss work periodically over the next few months to take his wife to chemotherapy appointments. The supervisor simply approves the absences as they occur, using the employee's available paid time off. The supervisor never informs HR, and the FMLA process is never initiated. Later, the employee needs a continuous block of leave and is terminated for exceeding the company's attendance policy, having already used his PTO.
This is a classic FMLA interference and retaliation claim waiting to happen. The employee provided sufficient information to signal a need for FMLA-qualifying leave—caring for a spouse with a serious health condition. The employer had an obligation to provide him with the required FMLA notices and begin the certification process.
AnFMLA training program drills this responsibility into every certified professional. The training emphasizes that the burden is on the employer to be inquisitive.
Not every employee is eligible for FMLA, and not every employer is required to provide it. However, making an error in this initial determination can lead to wrongly denying leave to an eligible employee or, conversely, providing protected leave to someone who doesn't qualify. Both scenarios create problems. Denying leave to an eligible employee is a direct violation of the law. Granting it to an ineligible one can set a difficult precedent and lead to operational challenges.
Eligibility requires a three-pronged test for the employee:
Mistakes often happen when calculating the 1,250 hours, especially for part-time or remote workers, or in determining if a company meets the 50-employee threshold.
A company has 40 employees at its main office and 15 employees who work from home but report to that office. An employee who has been with the company for three years and works full-time requests leave for the birth of his child. The HR manager, believing the company only has 40 employees "at the worksite," tells the employee the company is not a covered employer and denies the FMLA request.
This is a clear violation. The FMLA regulations state that an employee's worksite for remote workers is the office to which they report. Therefore, the company has 55 employees at that worksite, making it a covered employer. The employee was wrongly denied job-protected leave. A certified professional would know how to properly assessif a firm is subject to FMLA.
FMLA certification provides exhaustive training on the nuances of employer coverage and employee eligibility.
The FMLA has very specific and time-sensitive notice requirements that employers must follow. There isn't just one notice; there is a series of them, and failing to provide the right information at the right time is a common compliance failure. These failures can impede an employee's ability to use their FMLA rights and can lead the Department of Labor to find an employer in violation.
The key notices include:
An employee submits a medical certification for a continuous leave of four weeks. The HR department files the form but never sends the employee a formal Designation Notice confirming that the leave is being counted against their 12-week FMLA entitlement. Six months later, the same employee requests another eight weeks of leave for a different qualifying reason. The employer denies the request, stating the employee has already used four weeks and only has eight weeks remaining in the 12-month period.
The employer is at fault. Because they failed to provide the Designation Notice for the first leave, they may be prohibited from retroactively counting that time against the employee's FMLA allotment. The employee could argue they would have made different choices had they known their job-protected leave was being exhausted.
MasteringFMLA notice requirements is a core component of any FMLA certification program.
Intermittent FMLA leave is perhaps the single greatest challenge for employers. It allows an employee to take leave in separate, small blocks of time for a single qualifying reason. This can be for planned medical treatments or, more disruptively, for unpredictable flare-ups of a chronic condition. Employers often struggle with tracking this leave, managing attendance, and preventing abuse.
Common errors include using the wrong method to calculate used leave, disciplining employees for absences that should have been protected, or demanding recertification more frequently than the law allows.
An employee is approved for intermittent leave for migraines. Her certification states she may need to miss one to two full days per month. Over the next two months, she calls out for a half-day one week and is two hours late on three other occasions, all due to her condition. Her manager, frustrated with the unpredictable absences, issues her a written warning for tardiness based on the company's no-fault attendance policy.
The manager has just committed an act of FMLA retaliation. The absences were due to a certified FMLA condition and should have been coded as protected leave, not counted as disciplinary infractions.
A high-quality FMLA certification course provides an entire module dedicated to the complexities of intermittent leave.
At the end of their FMLA leave, an employee generally has the right to be reinstated to the same or an "equivalent" position. An equivalent position must have the same pay, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment. It must also involve substantially similar duties and responsibilities. A common mistake is to place the returning employee in a role that is "equivalent" in name only.
Another frequent error occurs when an employer requires a fitness-for-duty certification before allowing the employee to return but does so in a discriminatory or inconsistent manner.
A marketing manager returns from a 12-week FMLA leave for her own serious health condition. During her absence, her major accounts were reassigned. Upon her return, she is given the title of "Marketing Manager" and the same salary, but her new role involves only managing internal marketing projects with no client interaction and significantly less responsibility. The employer tells her this is an equivalent position.
This is a violation. While the pay and title are the same, the duties, responsibilities, and status are not "substantially similar." This could be considered a failure to reinstate and a form of retaliation for taking FMLA leave.
Certification training covers job restoration rights in detail, ensuring HR professionals understand the strict definition of an "equivalent position."
Each of these common mistakes—and many others—can be avoided with the right knowledge. FMLA certification is the most effective way to equip HR professionals with that knowledge. It moves HR from a reactive, uncertain position to one of proactive, confident FMLA compliance.
By becoming a certified FMLA administrator, you not only protect your organization from significant legal risk but also ensure that your employee leave management process is fair, consistent, and effective. You become the subject matter expert capable of training managers, creating compliant policies, and confidently handling even the most complex leave scenarios. This expertise strengthens your organization's compliance posture and elevates your own value as a strategic HR professional. Don't wait for a costly mistake to reveal gaps in your FMLA knowledge.