Background check compliance produces more class action litigation than almost any other HR process, and for a structural reason: the violations are procedural and uniform. If your disclosure form is defective, it is defective for every applicant you have ever processed.
Quick answer: Employers using a third-party background check must follow the FCRA's disclosure, authorization, pre-adverse action, and adverse action sequence exactly. Separately, state and local fair chance laws govern when criminal history may be asked about and how it may be used, usually requiring an individualized assessment before rejection.
Any background check obtained through a consumer reporting agency — which includes essentially every commercial vendor — triggers FCRA obligations. There are four mandatory steps and they must happen in order.
Before obtaining a report, provide a clear and conspicuous written disclosure that a consumer report may be obtained for employment purposes.
The standalone requirement is where employers fail. The disclosure must be in a document consisting solely of the disclosure. Courts have found the following extraneous content to violate the requirement:
The authorization may generally appear on the same document as the disclosure. Almost nothing else may.
Obtain the applicant's written authorization before requesting the report. Electronic authorization is acceptable if it meets the applicable standards.
Before taking any adverse action based in whole or in part on the report, provide:
Then wait a reasonable period before acting, so the applicant can review and dispute inaccuracies. Five business days is the common practice; some jurisdictions require longer. The purpose is genuine — background reports contain errors at a meaningful rate, including mismatched identities.
After the waiting period, if you proceed, provide a notice stating:
FCRA violations support actual damages, statutory damages for willful violations, punitive damages, and attorney fees. Because the process is uniform, a single defective form produces class-wide exposure. The most common claims: defective standalone disclosure, missing pre-adverse action notice, and inadequate waiting period.
Fair chance laws regulate the timing and use of criminal history. They exist at state, county, and city levels, and they differ in every dimension. Check each of these for every jurisdiction where you hire:
|
Variable |
Common Variations |
|
Timing of inquiry |
After initial application; after first interview; only after a conditional offer |
|
Scope of coverage |
Public employers only; public and private; contractor coverage; size thresholds |
|
What may be considered |
Restrictions on arrests without conviction, sealed or expunged records, and convictions older than a defined lookback period |
|
Individualized assessment |
Frequently required before rejection, with specified factors |
|
Notice and response rights |
A copy of the record, a written statement of the specific conviction relied on, and a defined period to respond — often longer than the FCRA's |
|
Job posting language |
Some jurisdictions require or prohibit specific statements about criminal history in postings |
Even where no local law requires it, EEOC guidance identifies three factors for assessing criminal conduct in employment decisions:
Where those factors suggest exclusion, the individualized assessment adds an opportunity for the individual to provide information about circumstances, rehabilitation, employment history since the offense, and other mitigating facts.
The underlying legal theory matters: because arrest and conviction rates differ across racial and ethnic groups, blanket criminal history exclusions can produce disparate impact under Title VII. A blanket policy — "no felonies, ever, for any position" — is difficult to defend as job related and consistent with business necessity.
No. The FCRA requires a document consisting solely of the disclosure. Embedding it in an application is one of the most-litigated violations.
The FCRA requires a reasonable period. Five business days is common practice; some jurisdictions require more. Set one standard and apply it uniformly.
Blanket exclusions risk disparate impact liability and violate fair chance laws in many jurisdictions. Conduct an individualized assessment tied to the specific job.
No, and you generally should not. Screening should be job-related. Document criteria by position type in advance rather than deciding case by case.
The FCRA applies to reports obtained from a consumer reporting agency. Internal checks may fall outside it — but state law, EEOC guidance, and fair chance ordinances still apply.
Background check exposure is concentrated in paperwork most organizations have not reviewed in years. An afternoon spent on the disclosure form and the adverse action workflow eliminates the majority of the risk.
The HR Generalist Certificate Program covers hiring compliance including background screening and fair chance requirements. For broader coverage, see HR compliance training.
👉 Browse HR compliance training →
Additional resources: HR Compliance FAQ | HR Best Practices | EEOC guidance on arrest and conviction records